Case Study from Employment Law Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

From Employment Law - Case Study Example312).In the case study, there argon very serious violations of the law that are explicit. In the first scenario, capital of Minnesota faces direct sex discrimination, graze base harassment and development. Under the Equality Act 2010 S11, sex is a protected characteristic for two male and the female. Under section 13(1) of the same act, it is unlawful to treat an individual unfairly on the chiliad of sex. Such act amounts to direct sex discrimination. Paul in this case faces direct sex discrimination. This is evident in that Pauls boss is never interested in training him for the job he was doing. Most banks of the world do train their employees before they start working beca mapping banking jobs are very demanding. Paul is further harassed by his boss. She shouts at him and down talks him in front of the customers. Shouting and use of shameful words in workplaces is a form of work place harassment (Swarnalatha, 2013, p. 2). Harassment an d victimization in the place of work carries the same weight as discrimination. However, in some cases, work place harassment and victimization are not prohibited by the law no matter how abusive they can be. In such cases therefore, the employees are protected by the Trade Unions. Under the Trade Unions and exertion Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the trade unions are adequately defined and equipped with adequate powers to protect the employees from every form of workplace harassment, victimization and any form of discrimination. Also, under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations Act 2006 S1 (246), the right to persistence in employments is well covered in the Act and therefore Paul has a right to go back to work.On the other hand, Amy is directly discriminated. Under the Equality Act 2010 S11, Religion is yet another(prenominal) protected characteristic. It is against the law to discriminate a